Bags / Shoes & Accessories

Home > News > Bags / Shoes & Accessories

"Super running shoes" caused controversy, "Putian shoes" collective trademark on

2021-08-10

According to a report on August 3 by the Buenos Aires Economic News Network, Argentina:

The technology for the athletes has greatly transformed the sports shoes, so many experts believe that it is the shoes that increase the speed of the athletes. Therefore, in the past few months, historical records have been repeatedly broken.

Like the men's 400-meter hurdles final of the Tokyo Olympics, it is very rare in the history of the Olympics that the championship and runners-up break the world record. A world record is easily broken, what's the matter?

This issue has caused controversy in the field of track and field, and everyone's eyes are on shoes.

The technology of serving athletes has greatly transformed sports shoes, so that many experts believe that it is the shoes that increase the speed of athletes. Therefore, historical records have been repeatedly broken in the past few months.

Carsten Waholm, a Norwegian star who has set two world records this year, has a lot of opinions on the new shoes made by Nike. In an interview with Agence France-Presse, he said: "If you put a spring in your shoes, it would be too despicable. I think this will damage the credibility of athletics. Nothing can be placed in the running shoes."

When asked how he set the record, Waholm said that his performance has nothing to do with Puma, the manufacturer of his sneakers:

"I chose the shoes developed by Puma and Mercedes Formula One team. I can say that our goal is to make these shoes as trustworthy as possible. Yes, we have carbon plates in our shoes, but we work hard. Make the carbon plate as thin as possible because I think it should be done. Of course, the technology will always exist, but I also hope that the technology can be maintained at a level that can be compared to the results of the competition. This is very important."

"Putian Shoes" Collective Trademark Authorized Boutique Pavilion Opened

On the 6th, the Putian shoe authorized boutique franchise hall was inaugurated in the Municipal Sports Center. This is the first offline physical display window for external publicity, promotion and sales of the collective trademark "Putian Shoes".

This time, the museum has 14 independent brand enterprises including Shuangchi Industrial Co., Ltd. and Youth Home (Fujian) Sporting Goods Co., Ltd., including sports shoes, business shoes, children's shoes, work shoes and other styles, and more than 100 products . These enterprises just obtained the authorization of the second batch of collective trademark "Putian Shoes" (sports and leisure shoes) on the 5th.

Tianchuang Fashion was issued a warning letter

Due to failure to disclose the overdue information of related party loans in a timely manner

On August 6, the Guangdong Securities Regulatory Bureau recently issued a decision on the measures to issue warning letters to Tianchuang Fashion Co., Ltd., Li Lin, Ni Jianming, and Yang Lu.

After investigation, Tianchuang Fashion provided a total of US$2.5 million to its related party United Nude International Limited (hereinafter referred to as UN) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Guangzhou Youren Footwear Trading Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Youren Shoes) in 2017 Of three-year interest-bearing loans. The related party UN Company and Youren Shoes did not repay the above-mentioned loans when due, and Tianchuang has not disclosed the overdue information of related party loans in a timely manner. The above-mentioned behavior of Tianchuang Fashion violated relevant regulations such as Article 2 and Article 32 of the "Administrative Measures on Information Disclosure of Listed Companies" (CSRC Order No. 40).

Li Lin, Chairman of Tianchuang Fashion, Ni Jianming, General Manager, and Yang Lu, Secretary of the Board of Directors, failed to perform due diligence obligations in accordance with Article 3 of the "Administrative Measures for Information Disclosure of Listed Companies" (CSRC Order No. 40), and were responsible for the above-mentioned issues. Have the main responsibility.


DISCLAIMER: All information provided by HMEonline is for reference only. None of these views represents the position of HMEonline, and HMEonline makes no guarantee or commitment to it. If you find any works that infringe your intellectual property rights in the article, please contact us and we will modify or delete them in time.
© 2022 Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
WhatsApp