Bags / Shoes & Accessories

On May 27, 2022, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) announced that it had made a 337 part final decision on certain casual shoes and packaging Theatre (investigation Code: 337-ta-1270): it would not review the preliminary decision (No.56) made by the administrative judge of the case on May 6, 2022, that is, based on the consent order, it would terminate the investigation on the listed defendant Loeffler Randall Inc., New York, NY.

On May 17, 2022, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) issued the final decision: the preliminary decision (No.54) made by the administrative judge of the case on April 22, 2022 was not reviewed, that is, based on the consent order, the investigation of the listed defendant, Royal Deluxe accessories, LLC, New Providence, NJ, was terminated, and the consent order was issued.

On March 18, 2022, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling (No.46) made by the administrative judge of the case on March 3, 2022 was not reviewed, that is, based on the consent order, the investigation of the listed defendants maxhouse rise Ltd., Hong Kong, China and Fujian wanjiaxin industrial development, inc.a/k/a Fujian wanjiaxin light industrial development, Inc. Fujian wanjiaxin Light Industry Development Co., Ltd. was terminated, And issue a consent order.

On February 22, 2022, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) issued the final decision: the preliminary decision (No.40) made by the administrative judge of the case on February 1, 2022 was not reviewed, that is, the investigation of the listed defendant kgs sourcing Ltd. Kaijie management consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. was terminated for reasonable reasons.

On February 4, 2022, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced that it had made a 337 part final decision on certain casual shoes and packaging thereof (investigation Code: 337-ta-1270): it would not review the preliminary decision (No.39) made by the administrative judge of the case on January 11, 2022, that is, based on the settlement, it would terminate the review of the listed defendant Dongguan east footwear enterprises Co., Guangdong, China, Ltd. and issued a consent order.

On December 6, 2021, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) issued the final decision: the preliminary decision (No.34) made by the administrative judge of the case on November 10, 2021 was not reviewed, that is, based on the settlement and consent order, the investigation of the listed defendant 718closeouts, Brooklyn, NY was terminated, and the consent order was issued.

On November 29, 2021, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) issued the final decision: the preliminary decision (No.32, 33) made by the administrative judge of the case on November 1, 2021 was not reviewed, that is, based on the consent order, the investigation of the listed defendants PW shoes, inc.a/k/a p&w, shoe Nami, Inc., Gretna, La was terminated, and the consent order was issued.

On November 17, 2021, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) issued the final decision: the preliminary decision (No.30) made by the administrative judge of the case on September 13, 2021 was not reviewed, that is, based on the information found, the appeal was modified, and eight listed defendants were added, namely, Huizhou xinshunzu Shoes Co., Ltd., Huizhou xinshunzu Shoes Co., Ltd., Guangdong, China, orley shoe Corp., and Dongguan Eastar footwear enterprises Co., Guangdong, China, Ltd., Dongguan Yida Shoes Co., Ltd., Shanghai kgs sourcing Ltd., China Kaijie decoration management consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and mold industry de matrizes ltda D/b/a boaonda, Fujian wanjiaxin industrial development, inc.a/k/a, Fujian wanjiaxin light industry development, Inc., Walmart Inc., and Jinjiang Ao Footwear Co., Ltd., Fujian, China; Due to insufficient reasons, they do not agree to add Burlington shoes, Inc., Shanghai mamiye Brothers Inc., meimaiya Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and Jinjiang Linqi shoes&clothes Co., Ltd., Fujian, China as listed defendants; The investigation of crocsky, Austin, TX, ink tee, Los Angeles, CA, hobear shoes and Clothing Ltd., Brighton, CO in the United States was partially terminated, It does not agree to be called "unknown manufacturers"; in addition, the preliminary decision (No.31) made by the administrative judge of the case on October 22, 2021 will not be reviewed, that is, the expected closing date will be extended by four months to May 9, 2023, and the hearing date will be adjusted to September 12-16, 2022. It is expected that the final decision on infringement will be issued on January 9, 2023.

On October 7, 2021, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling: the preliminary ruling (no.22-25) made by the administrative judge of the case on September 17, 2021 will not be reviewed, that is, based on the settlement and consent order, the listed defendants fullbeauty brands inc.d/b/a kingsize, new York, NY, legend footwear, Inc., d/b/a/wild diva, city of industry, CA, Fujian Huayuan well import and export trade Co., Ltd., China will be terminated respectively, China Fujian huayuanweier import and export trade Co., Ltd. and York Fashion International LLC, New York, NY of the United States investigated and issued a consent order.

On July 6, 2021, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) voted to launch a 337 investigation (investigation Code: 337-ta-1270) on certain casual shoes and packaging thereof.

On June 8, 2021, Crocs, inc.of Broomfield, Colorado filed a 337 investigation application with ITC of the United States, claiming that the product exported, imported and sold in the United States infringed its patent right (U.S. registered trademark No. 3836415, 5149328, 5273875), and requested ITC of the United States to issue a general exclusion order, a limited exclusion order and a prohibition order.

Fujian Quanzhou Zhengde network Corp., d/b/a amoji, China Quanzhou Zhengde Technology Network Co., Ltd., the United States 718closeouts, Brooklyn, NY, the United States Royal Deluxe accessories, LLC, New Providence, NJ, Fujian Huayuan well import and export trade Co., Ltd., China Fujian Huayuan well import and export trade Co., Ltd., are listed defendants.